It is also possible that seen matchmaking between roentgen-EMD and you can rate enjoys a psychological basis

It is also possible that seen matchmaking between roentgen-EMD and you can rate enjoys a psychological basis

Relative studies statement a variety of electromechanical delays for relaxation. 7 m s ?step 1 . Thinking to have Tamar wallabies’ roentgen-EMD also are somewhat shorter than are those of your own turkey LG, ranging from ?thirty-two ms on the plantaris to 43 ms about LG [based on Fig. 8, (Biewener mais aussi al. 2004)]. Opinions on the foot extensors off guinea fowl be seemingly the same as that from turkeys (?sixty ms, considering advertised counterbalance moments and you may stride moments to own powering within step 1.step three yards s ?1 , (Daley and Biewener 2003). New r-EMD to own an effective guinea fowl digital flexor is apparently shorter, ?31 ms (Daley and Biewener 2003).

Biewener and colleagues (1992) discovered an r-EMD off 17 ms for the starling pectoralis while in the airline within thirteen

What teaches you brand new adaptation inside the mentioned r-EMD in numerous varieties, and you can exactly what shows you new type for the roentgen-EMD around the rate regarding the turkey LG? The fresh new variation into the r-EMD inside chicken LG might possibly be merely an enthusiastic artifact resulting off a finite ability to locate really low-peak EMG signals. EMG amplitude is lowest at the slowest performance. Low-top EMG indicators you to definitely are present later in effect production within slowest performance you are going to slide less than our endurance to own detection, leading to an enthusiastic overestimate of your own roentgen-EMD. If this is the reason behind the fresh new development noticed right here, our efficiency are most associated since the an alert getting presumptions about just one EMD getting EMG indicators across the a selection of situations. Without size of force, all of our measurements of EMG would have contributed to possibly a keen overestimation of your duration of push in the punctual rate, otherwise an enthusiastic underestimate of your own duration of push during the sluggish increase, depending on the worth having roentgen-EMD which had been assumed.

A love anywhere between alterations in muscles length and you will timing of push innovation you may originate from the determine regarding muscles velocity for the push productivity, and/or regarding interaction between activation/recreational procedure and you will changes in muscle tissue size that have been noticed inside vitro (Gordon ainsi que al

Exactly as shortening velocity (such as taking on loose) can also be more than likely determine this new EMD to have muscle tissue activation, it will be questioned you to muscle mass speed you certainly will dictate the electromechanical impede to have muscles amusement. 2000). not, our very own performance advise that the brand new version in r-EMD that have locomotor speed isn’t said of the adaptation regarding the pattern off shortening or stretching of one’s muscle, since there is no correlation anywhere between fascicle speed and r-EMD.

Changes in the pattern of muscle fiber recruitment might explain the observed correlation between r-EMD and locomotor speed. A longer r-EMD would be expected for slower types of fibers, as they have lower rates of Ca 2+ cycling and longer relaxation times (Close 1972). This influence of excitation–contraction kinetics likely explains much of the variation in r-EMD between different muscles and different species. For example, during fast flight a starling’s entire downstroke phase is <40 ms, a time course that undoubtedly requires fast fibers with very rapid rates of force onset and decay (Biewener et al. 1992). These rapid rates are apparent not only in the Starling's very short r-EMD, but also in the very short activation EMD (?3 ms for rapid flight, Biewener et al. 1992). Within humans, fiber type has been implicated as one of the factors influencing EMD (Norman and Komi 1979). Slow fibers recruited in the turkey LG at slow walking speeds would be expected to have slower rates of relaxation (and therefore longer r-EMD) than the fast fibers that are added to the recruited pool at faster speeds. The problem with this possible explanation for the pattern of r-EMD observed here is that it would seem to violate Henneman's size principle for the order of recruitment of motor units (Henneman et al. 1974). According to the size principle, slow fibers recruited at slow speeds should continue to be recruited at fast speeds; that is, slow fibers are not derecruited as additional fast fibers are recruited. Thus, one would expect that the time from the offset of EMG activity to the offset of force would be dominated by the slow relaxation time course of slower motor units at all speeds. Other studies using arguably more refined methods for inferring motor unit recruitment from EMG signals have found evidence that the order of motor unit recruitment does not always follow the size principle (Wakeling et al. 2002; Hodson-Tole and Wakeling 2007). Further study in this area is warranted.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée.